A pioneering spirit in the face of economic uncertainty is propelling 2011...Read More
Editor's Note
Celebrating Growth
Special Section
Cold Feet
Executive Living
Easy to be Green
Industry Outlook
HUMAN RESOURCES
EntrepreneurEdge
Living the Brand
Business Trends
Mind Your Manners
Focus
Rough Road Ahead
Features
Spin Cycle
Spotlight
Taylor Randall
Spotlight
Tarang Amin
Money Talk
The Cash Coaster
Lessons Learned
The Consolidation Process
Regional Report
Utah County Report
Economic Insight
Worth the Risk?
TechKnowledge
You are Here
Legal Briefs
You’re Fired
By the Books
Good to Great
Players
Players
Utah’s human resources professionals are proving their worth as companies face mounting issues such as healthcare changes, undocumented worker challenges and compliance issues. Our human resources and staffing experts discussed the challenges and successes they have experienced as they face these and other complex issues.
We’d like to give a special thank you to David Cherrington, professor of organizational leadership at Brigham Young University, for moderating the discussion and to Holland & Hart for hosting the event.
Participants: Randy Price, Big-D Construction; David Cherrington, BYU; Dusty Fenwick, KLAS Enterprises; Tera Sunder, Nelson Laboratories; Roger Tsai, Holland & Hart; Chris Thomas, Intrepid; Michael King, USANA Health Sciences; Brian Lee, Performance Progression Lisa Meiling, Sorenson Development; Clark Cotterell, Management Recruiters; Peggy Stone, Academy Mortgage Corporation; Dalynn Jones, Employer Solutions Group; Sharon Roux, The Summit Group; Monica Whalen, The Employers Council; Brad Fagersgren, ISI
There are some incredible issues that HR is going to have to deal with in respect to entitlement programs, Social Security, workers’ compensation and so forth. What is your perspective on how this is going to impact human resource management?
FENWICK: Funding the entitlement programs has shifted slowly toward the corporate sector. We used to be able to make sure our ducks were in a row—take, for example, unemployment. We could make sure that we never had any unemployment costs outside of our regular rates, and nowadays we are hard put to not have to pay for individuals’ unemployment, and we see that with a lot of areas.
PRICE: As entitlement programs get cut, we’ll see a workforce that will continue to age, and the opportunities for individuals to retire will diminish. We’ll see people working longer. We already see it in construction. The average age of a construction worker is about 45 right now and it’s continuing to go up, and those people are not leaving the workforce.
FENWICK: Which is also going to hit healthcare; it’s going to hit workers’ compensation.
The Social Security Administration is saying that the current program is not sustainable. What are your thoughts? LEE: First of all, I never believed it was going to last this long. I don’t know what the solution is, but I don’t think long- term social funding is the right answer. People are going to have to find a way to save for their own retirement plan, for their own future, because waiting for the government to do it has not worked.
Even in the early days when we had defined pension plans and so forth, people would just assume that everything was going to be taken care of when they retired, and I saw a lot of discouragement when they found out what’s really there.
The same thing is true of Social Security. People assume that it’s just going to take care of them, and when they find out what the benefits are like, they find out that’s not true. So there has to be another solution that we can pursue personally and maybe even in business to help enhance that.
ROUX: We’ve added to the problem recently because of the temporary cuts in the employee’s portion of that contribution. Employees are paying 2 percent less, the employer’s portion is staying the same, but at the time when we say we can’t fund it, we’ve cut back the money going into it. There’s some talk now that that will continue beyond 2011. So we’ll see what happens there.
Within my own employee population, I thought people might take that 2 percent and increase their 401(k) contributions. Two people did it—and one of them was me. I thought that was interesting.
We want to have the lower contribution, we want lower taxes, but we want that benefit to be there and we’re not saving on our own for it either. So that’s just compounding the problem.
FENWICK: And it’s never going to change until the rhetoric changes, where politicians are not promising that everybody will be taken care of anymore. It perpetuates the idea that, “Oh, I’ll be taken care of somehow. Somehow they’ll find a way.” At some point there is going to be the time where everybody jumps up and says, “We’ve got to make a change now.” Nobody wants to hit that point while they are currently in power because it’s going to be very painful at that transition point.
info@utahbusiness.com | 90 South 400 West, Ste 650 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 | (801) 568-0114
Advertise with Utah Business